We thought we should update our valuation of Facebook (FB), the
momo stock (momentum stock), which shot up from below $18/sh to nearly
$55/sh. Of course, this was after the
stock closed at $38.23, below its IPO price, after the first day of trading in
May '12. Simply put, FB dropped more
than 50% below its IPO price to $17.73 (which we enjoyed), and it climbed nearly 200%
which was certainly welcomed by many FB fans.
The stock has been a momo one for the past 3.5 months.
The Company reported its Q3 results on Wednesday, handily
beating, on the top and bottom-line. The
mobile ad strategy has certainly begun to payoff for FB as its overall ARPU
grew 7.5% and 33.8% Q/Q and Y/Y, respectively.
Such growth was driven by increase in MAUs and number of ads within news
feeds, mainly on the mobile platform. In
fact, we estimate mobile ad ARPU (mobile ad revenues per mobile-only users) of
$3.47 in Q3, significantly above the $1.51 total ad ARPU. Impressive top-line growth certainly helped
the bottom-line as we did see a Y/Y non-GAAP EBIT margin expansion of
430bps. In addition, management touched
on some of the newer products that the Company is currently working on. However, we will need to have patience in
order to see some return on those.
There were some negatives that came along with the positives we
just mentioned. For example, management
acknowledged it believes daily active usage by younger teens is slightly
declining, which is basically the last thing that advertisers want to
hear.
Management also stated that the Company will not increase
the number of mobile ads (via news feed).
We believe, based on its own research, the Company has learned that
given the limited amount of space on mobile devices and the users' limited
attention span, additional ads will not only reduce ad ROIs, they may drive
away users. This is something that we
briefly touched on more than a year ago.
We actually believe that when it comes to mobile advertising, it must be
based on a 'pull' strategy and not a 'push' strategy. This becomes even more important when FB is
dealing with large brand names and trying to help them create long-term
marketing and advertising strategies. An
analyst touched on this during the call by asking a push/pull question. Unfortunately, the CEO did not necessarily
answer the question.
Fear of decline in prices may be another reason why
management has decided to no longer increase number of mobile ads via news
feeds. By limiting the supply of ad space
(number of places available to place ads in) and assuming that demand will stay
constant or increase, management is managing the ad prices, in our
opinion. This becomes even more
important when user growth begins to decelerate, which we have seen in the
North American region. In addition, we
believe prices of ads placed on desktops have plummeted, and management is
hoping mobile ads' significant revenue growth will continue, as it certainly has to more than offset the decline in desktop ad revenues.
We also believe FB has realized its 'closed network'
strategy is not paying off as well as it had hoped, especially when there are
more open players, such as Twitter, in the social media space. In fact, we were amused at how much the CEO
tried not to mention Twitter when answering a question regarding FB's 'latest
strategy' of using hashtags ('#'). This
is one reason why Instagram has been successful as it is more open than
original Facebook. However, FB is yet to
monetize Instagram. It is progressing
slowly as the Company does not want to risk turning Instagram users away by
throwing too many ads (whether text, images or video) at them. Successful monetization of Instagram does
represent an upside for FB.
With the upcoming Twitter IPO, we believe FB will be facing
a lot more competition as it seeks more ad dollars. As management said, current mobile ad dollars
represent only 3% of total ad budgets, which means it has a lot of room to
grow. However, we believe such growth
will be accompanied by more ad distributors, somewhat limiting growth of the
size of their piece of the pie. Twitter
is also well-suited for most mobile device users, as they likely have short
attention span and will be multi-tasking, at least while using the device. And twitter is open; open not only for users,
but also for advertisers and companies.
Going back to FB, we continue to value it below where it is
currently trading. Our DCF model spit
out a $25.94/sh valuation, significantly below where the stock closed
at on 10/30. At $49.01, FB is trading at
an FY '14 EV/Sales multiple of 12, higher than its peers' 6. It is also trading nearly 50x its FY '14
non-GAAP EPS, which is below its peers' average of 95x. However, we note the group P/E average is
significantly inflated by AMZN's 133 and YELP's 268. Our updated estimates are provided
below.
Lastly, we will provide updates on IACI, AVID, and BCOR (reporting Q3 next week) by
Sunday. IACI did report earnings on
Tuesday and missed big on the top-line.
It closed down 8.5% at $53/sh, barely below our valuation of the Company,
which is $54/sh. We will review the
numbers and provide an update later this week.
Also, since the last time we posted some BS on our blog (7/30), AVID has
gone up 16%, compared to S&P 500’s 4.6% increase. In fact, the stock has jumped 39% since
mid-Sep. As a reminder, AVID is
currently in the process of reviewing its revenue recognition, and it may get
de-listed from NASDAQ. However, NASDAQ
has given the Company more time to update its financial results and file the
necessary 10-Qs and 10-Ks with the SEC.
It is up only 6% from when we initially suggested it, compared to
S&P 500’s 24% increase since then.
We note the stock had climbed more than 17% before taking a dump after
the revenue recognition review announcement. BCOR closed at $23.18 on Wednesday, up 53%+ since we suggested it in late Jan '13; this is compared to S&P 500's 17% increase since then. Similar to AVID, BCOR has gone up 16% since our last post, higher than the market's 4.6%.
No comments:
Post a Comment